Under
conditions of simultaneous access to food of
unbalanced nutrient composition, fish learn to consume
those diet components that provide their energetic and nutritional needs. In
trophic ecology and ethology, this form of dietary behaviour is named dietary self-selection or macronutrient self-selection.
In the
bibliographic list given below, you will find the basic references allowing to
learn the main aspects of this phenomenon. In fishing, for example, the right
design of baits, lures and groundbaits is impossible without deep knowledge in
this area.
Carp boilies offered by CC Moore
Basic References
Almaida-Pagán
P.F., Rubio V.C., Mediola P., De Costa J., Madrid J.A. 2006. Macronutrient selection
through post-ingestive signals in sharpsnout seabream fed gelatine capsules and
challenged with protein dilution. Physiology
& Behavior 88, 550-558
Aranda A.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Zamora S., Madrid J.A. 2000. Self-design of fish diets by means
of self-feeders: validation of procedures. Journal
of Physiology and Biochemistry 56, 155-166.
Aranda A.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Madrid
J.A. 2001. Effect of short-term fasting on macronutrient self-selection in sea
bass. Physiology & Behavior 73,
105-109
Geurden I.,
Cuvier A., Gondouin E., Olsen R.E., Ruohonen K., Kaushik S., Boujard T. 2005. Rainbow trout can discriminate between feeds with different oil
sources. Physiology & Behavior
85, 107-114
Huntingford
F., Jobling M., Kadri S. (Editors). 2012. Aquaculture and Behavior. Wiley-Blackwell,
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester,
United Kingdom
Moore
B., Marsh K., Wallis I. 2005. Taught by
animals: how understanding diet selection leads to better zoo diets. International
Zoo Yearbook 39, 43-61
Rubio V.C.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Madrid
J.A. 2003. Macronutrient
selection through postingestive signals in sea bass fed on gelatine capsules. Physiology & Behavior 78, 795-803
Rubio V.C.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Madrid
J.A. 2005. Fish
macronutrient selection through post-ingestive signals: Effect of selective macronutrient
deprivation. Physiology & Behavior 84, 651-657
Rubio V.C.,
Boluda Navarro D., Madrid J.A., Sánchez-Vázquez F.J. 2009. Macronutrient self-selection in Solea senegalensis fed macronutrient
diets and challenged with dietary protein dilutions. Aquaculture 291, 95-100
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Yamamoto T., Akiyama T., Madrid J.A., Tabata, M. 1998. Selection of macronutrients by goldfish operating self-feeders. Physiology and Behavior 65, 211–218
Sánchez-Vázquez
F.J., Yamamoto T., Akiyama T., Madrid
J.A., Tabata M., 1999. Macronutrient
self-selection through demand-feeders in rainbow trout. Physiology & Behavior 66, 45-51
Vivas M.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Garcia Garcia B., Madrid J.A. 2003. Macronutrient self-selection in
European sea bass in response to dietary protein or fat restriction. Aquaculture Research 34, 271-280
Vivas M.,
Rubio V.C., Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Mena C., Garcia Garcia B., Madrid J.A. 2006. Dietary self-selection in sharpsnout seabream (Diplodus puntazzo) fed paired
macronutrient feeds and challenged with protein dilution. Aquaculture
251, 430-437
Yamamoto
T., Shima T., Furuita H., Shiraishi M., Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Tabata M. 2001. Influence of decreasing water
temperature and shortening of the light phase on macronutrient self-selection
by rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
and common carp Cyprinus carpio. Fisheries Science 67, 420-429
Yamamoto
T., Shima T., Furuita H., Suzuki N. 2003. Effect of water temperature and
short-term fasting on macronutrient self-selection by common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture 220, 655-666
| |
Monday, April 30, 2018
Dietary self-selection in fish: basic bibliography
Chemosensory sensitivity of some salmonid and acipenserid fish to natural attractants
Family, species | Thresholds of chemosensory sensitivity: given in parts of standard exctract 1 gram food per l water |
Acipenseridae stellate sturgeon, Acipenser stellatus Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baeri | bloodworm extracts 10-4 (Kasumyan & Kazhlaev, 1993) |
Salmonidae sockeye, Oncorhynchus nerka | brine shrimp, zooplankton extracts 10-5 beef liver, beef heart extracts 10-3 — 10-2 (McBride et al., 1962) |
Salmonidae Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, brook trout, Salmo trutta |
Trichoptera larva extracts
10-3 (Marusov, 1975) |
Salmo trutta, by Harald Seide
Basic References
Kasumyan A.O., Kazhlaev A.A. 1993. Formation of searching behavioral reaction and olfactory sensitivity to food chemical signals during ontogeny of sturgeons (Acipenseridae). Journal of Ichthyology 33, 51-65
Marusov E.A. 1975. The
reaction of young salmonids to some natural chemical stimuli. Journal of Ichthyology 15, 375-377
McBride J.R., Idler D.R., Jonas R.E.E.,
Tomlinson N. 1962. Olfactory perception in juvenile salmon. I. Observations on
response of juvenile sockeye to extracts of foods. Journal of the Fisheries
Research Board of Canada
19, 327-334
Chemosensory sensitivity of some cyprinid fish to natural attractants
Species | Thresholds of chemosensory sensitivity: given in parts of standard exctract 1 gram food per l water (1 gram live food per hour per l water, for exometabolites) |
common carp, Cyprinus carpio | 10-4 (10-1 g/h/l) |
silver crucian, Carassius auratus gibelio |
10-3 |
minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus | 10-3 (10-1 g/h/l) |
common gudgeon, Gobio gobio |
10-3 |
zebrafish, Danio rerio |
10-3 |
lacustrine bleak, Leucaspius delineatus |
10-1 |
Extracts and exometabolites of bloodworms, Chironomus plumosus, are used in these experiments.
Common minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus
Basic References
Kasumyan
A.O., Ponomarev V.Y. 1986a. Behaviour peculiarities of some cyprinid
fish species under the influence of natural chemical feeding stimuli. Biological Sciences, reposed at 25.03.86 under #1948-B
Kasumyan A.O., Ponomarev V.Y. 1986b. Study of the behaviour of zebrafish Brachydanio rerio Hamilton-Buchanan under the influence of natural chemical food signals. Journal of Ichthyology 26, 665-673
Field observations on indirect clay-eating in cyprinid fish
Clay-eating
as one of the forms of geophagy is well known and documented in many animals (for
more data, see Dietary Clay Boilies. Natural product number one in the ethical angling world). Unfortunately, next to nothing is
known about clay-eating in fish in the nature (in particular, Ms. Ulli Limpitlaw does not
report such cases: personal communication).
Some our
observations on indirect clay-eating in fish (in clayey localites of the Goryn
river and other right affluents of the Pryp’yat river, Ukraine, beginning from the 1970s)
are given below.
Among
various clayey localities in the foregoing region, those localities that are
colonized by the burrowing invertebrates, such as maylies Ephemeroptera (in
particular, Ephemera vulgata), with
the accompanying microfauna, are most attractive for fish. Localities of this
type are easily detected on the above-water (dried) and underwater clayey or
clayey-carbonate grounds dotted with the numerous burrows of mayfly larvae. Cyprinids
(about 15 species, except limnophilic species), percids (such as perch, Perca fluviatilis, sander, Stizostedion luciopera, and Don ruffe, Gymnocephalus acerina) as well
as juvenile pike, Esox lucius, wels,
Silurus glanis, and burbot, Lota lota, constantly keep these places. Judging by the
compostion of their intestines, larvae E.
vulgata are the main component (up to 90-95 weight percent in benthivorous cyprinids)
of their diets. Large benthivorous cyprinids, such as bream, Abramis brama, and others, can dig the
clayey and (harder) clayey-carbonate grounds unaidedly: in our context,
searching for the larvae, they can ingest the clay. Other fish explore actively
and nibble the crumbling pieces of the clayey bank or feed in the windy
weather, when the waves break up the clay
ground (with the characteristic muddy trails) and
wash the larvae.
Fresh
chunks of the burrowing clay, placed purposely at the closely spaced sites of
the sandy shallow (30-50 cm depth), attract juvenile cyprinids, like ever-present
roach, Rutilus rutilus, and others,
with an intensive nibbling.
Besides
the general observations, interesting results have been obtained with the assistance of
express pair comparisons of the olfactory preferences for the different clays.
Of the two balls (4 cm diameter, equal color) made, one, of the fresh burrowing
clay and, the other, of the same but old, sun-dried clay (collected at the
shore) and placed at the sandy shallow at the 30 cm distance each from other fish
have prefered the first (the total number of pair tests n = 12, fixing the
first nibble, sign test, P < 0.05).
The
olfactory attractiveness of balls made of the fresh burrowing clay must be
determined, in the first turn, by the exometabolites of live E. vulgata larvae. At high density of larve
in the clay (50-70 individuals per l liter clay, as in our cases), the
concentration of larva exometabolites is more than sufficient to be detected by
the cyprinids (threshold is 10-1 g live larvae per hour per l liter water: Kasumyan & Ponomarev, 1986 a,b).
The non-negligible olfactory attractiveness of balls made of the shore, "old” clay
may be explained by the presence of residual and newly formed microfauna
(microflora).
Balls made
of the fresh burrowing clay is step-by-step digged out by fish. Perhaps, part
of the clay saturated with the mayfly larva exometabolites is ingested.
Basic References
Kasumyan
A.O., Ponomarev V.Y. 1986a. Behaviour peculiarities of some cyprinid fish
species under the influence of natural chemical feeding stimuli. Biological Sciences, reposed at 25.03.86
under #1948-B
Kasumyan
A.O., Ponomarev V.Y. 1986b. Study of the
behaviour of zebrafish Brachydanio rerio
Hamilton-Buchanan under the influence of natural chemical food signals. Journal of Ichthyology 26, 665-673
Microsmatic fish: Chinese perch
Find more information about microsmatic fish here:Olfactory behaviour of microsmatic fish, including Northern pike (Esox lucius)
Read also:
Liang X.F., Liu J.K., Huang B.Y. 1998. The role of sense organs in the feeding behaviour of Chinese perch. Journal of Fish Biology 52, 1058-1067
Dietary Clay Boilies. Natural product number one in the ethical angling world
Phenomenon of soil ingestion, or geophagy, attracts
an attention of numerous researchers for years (Woywodt & Kiss, 2002). Geophagy is not exhibited everywhere, but it is widespread in many
animals and human (for review, see Mahaney & Krishnamani, 2003; Limpitlaw,
2010).
Johns & Duquette (1991) suggest that the physiological
significance of geophagy made it important in the evolution of human dietary
behaviour.
More than 50
species of animals have been reported to ingest various types of clays, salt
and other Earth materials, in particular at sites named "licks”. In general, this
form of dietary behaviour allows an animal to provide its organism with the
needed nutrients, solve gastrointestinal and intoxication problems, suppress some maladies and improve general vital
indexes (Limpitlaw, 2010).
In
particular, parrots are ones of the most studied soil-eaters (e.g., Gilardi et
al., 1999; Brightsmith, 2004; Brightsmith et al., 2004, 2008).
Members of
our group have started the first experiments with clay-eating in fishing in the
end of 1980s, after lucky detectiing an open deposit of high quality white clay on an abrupt bank of
the Dnipro river (localities in Ukraine).
First of all, this clay was used to prepare fishing groundbaits (with an
excellent attractive effect). In the subsequent years,
four basic ways to
use clay-eating in fishing (see below) were elaborated. Taking into
account the current hazardous ecological situation in the most part of
water bodies, we
have decided to enter such technological products as the Dietary Clay Pellets & Dietary Clay Boilies into mass production.
In total, the
following basic clayey products (of the white, green, yellow, orange and red
colors) are elaborated:
1. Paste,
or Plasticine
2. Polenta
3. Dietary
Clay & Rice Pellets
4. Dietary
Clay & Rice Boilies
In the latter
two cases, the white processed rice (up to about 30 weight percent) has been
used in the capacity of an extender and binder. This rice is lighter than the
common rice meal and flakes. It quickly dissolves in the water. Yet, it is
quickly digested in the intestines of fish. Recall also, rice products (without
salt, sugar and spices) are widely and effectively used in the human diets.
To test
dietary pellets and boilies, one week pre-baiting campaigns with the everyday
morning and evening sessions were conducted in the field. For the first
presentation in the 1st day, items enhanced with powder, liquid or spray
attractants (one type within all sessions) were only used. In the 2nd, 3rd and
4th days, mixes of enhanced and non-enhanced items, taken in the percent ratio
of 70:30, 50:50 and 30:70, were used. Finally, in the remaining days,
non-enhanced pellets and boilies or even practically blank kaolin balls with
small amount of binder were only offered.
According
to our observations, to the end of the pre-baiting campaigns fish usually
readily eat non-enhanced or blank clayey pellets (used for roach, Rutilus rutilus, and other relatively
small fish) and boilies (used for carp, Cyprinus
carpio), demonstrating in this way that they include these items in their
natural, in water bodies with weak angling pressure, or semi-narural, in other
cases, diets.
Generally,
this form of dietary behaviour, named dietary
self-selection or macronutrient
self-selection, is determined by an individual experience of an animal and
reflects the positive associations between some macronutrients and physiological
state of this animal, which are established during its learning in the nature, aquaculture,
zoo or laboratory (for review, see Moore et al., 2005; Huntingford et al., 2012).
These macronutrients provide energy requirements, optimum protein, fat and carbohydrate levels, or, more
specifically, vitamin, mineral and other requirements.
In
respect of fish, the
phenomenon of dietary self-selection has attracted an undivided
attention of numerous researchers approximately from the second part of
1990s (e.g., Sánchez-Vázquez
et al., 1999; Aranda et
al., 2000, 2001; Yamamoto et al., 2001; Rubio et al., 2003; Vivas et al., 2003;
Yamamoto et al., 2003). Of course, direct
biochemical, trophological and biomedical investigations of clayey diets in
fish will be useful to the further development of diet designing in aquaculture,
fishing (baits, lures, groundbaits) and related areas.
Basic References
Aranda A.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Zamora S., Madrid J.A. 2000. Self-design of fish diets by means
of self-feeders: validation of procedures. Journal
of Physiology and Biochemistry 56, 155-166.
Aranda A.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Madrid
J.A. 2001. Effect of short-term fasting on macronutrient self-selection in sea
bass. Physiology & Behavior 73,
105-109
Brightsmith
D. J. 2004. Effects of weather on parrot geophagy in Tambopata, Peru. Wilson Bulletin 116, 134-145
Brightsmith
D. J., Aramburú R. 2004. Avian geophagy and soil characteristics in Southeastern Peru. Biotropica
36, 534-543
Brightsmith
D. J., Taylor J., Phillips T.D. 2008. The roles of soil characteristics and toxin adsorption in avian geophagy. Biotropica 40, 766-774
Gilardi
J.D., Duffey S.S., Munn C.A.,
Tell L.A. 1999.
Biochemical functions of geophagy in parrots: Detoxification of dietary toxins
and cytoprotective effects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25, 897-922
Huntingford
F., Jobling M., Kadri S. (Editors). 2012. Aquaculture and Behavior. Wiley-Blackwell,
The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester,
United Kingdom
Johns T.,
Duquette M. 1991. Detoxification and mineral supplementation as functions of
geophagy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53, 448-456
Limpitlaw
U.G. 2010. Ingestion of Earth materials for health by humans and animals. International
Geology Review 52, 726-744
Mahaney
W.C., Krishnamani R. 2003. Understanding geophagy in animals: standard
procedures for sampling soils. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29, 1503-1523
Moore
B., Marsh K., Wallis I. 2005. Taught by
animals: how understanding diet selection leads to better zoo diets. International
Zoo Yearbook 39, 43-61
Rubio V.C.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Madrid
J.A. 2003. Macronutrient
selection through postingestive signals in sea bass fed on gelatine capsules. Physiology & Behavior 78, 795-803
Sánchez-Vázquez
F.J., Yamamoto T., Akiyama T., Madrid
J.A., Tabata M., 1999. Macronutrient
self-selection through demand-feeders in rainbow trout. Physiology & Behavior 66, 45-51
Vivas M.,
Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Garcia Garcia B., Madrid J.A. 2003. Macronutrient self-selection in
European sea bass in response to dietary protein or fat restriction. Aquaculture Research 34, 271-280
Yamamoto
T., Shima T., Furuita H., Shiraishi M., Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Tabata M. 2001. Influence of decreasing water
temperature and shortening of the light phase on macronutrient self-selection
by rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
and common carp Cyprinus carpio. Fisheries Science 67, 420-429
Yamamoto T.,
Shima T., Furuita H., Suzuki N. 2003. Effect of water temperature and
short-term fasting on macronutrient self-selection by common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture 220, 655-666
Woywodt A.,
Kiss A. 2002. Geophagia: the history of earth-eating. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
95, 143-146
Sunday, April 29, 2018
How long the aquatic animals can remember the chemical search images?
In general, an acquired chemical serch image forms in the long-term memory of an animal during its learning (both in the nature or laboratory) and is used
further as an etalon (template, specimen) to collate the receiving perceptual information.
In the aquatic animals, for example, the chemical search images can form in respect of odors of food, predators, school mates and other objects.
In the aquatic animals, for example, the chemical search images can form in respect of odors of food, predators, school mates and other objects.
How long the aquatic animals can remember the chemical search images?
For example, American river crayfish, Orconectes virilis, trained during 2 weeks to eat freshly crushed zebra mussels, remember an odor of these molluscs without its refreshment within at least 20 days, but forget it after 40 days (Hazlett 1994). According to Brown and Smith’s (1994) laboratory experiments, fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, lived in the nature in relatively permanent shoals of familiar mates but kept separately, remember an odor of former mates for over 2 months.
Basic References
Brown G.E., Smith R.J.F. 1994. Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate shoalmates from unfamiliar conspecifics. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 3051-3061
Hazlett B.A. 1994. Crayfish feeding responses to zebra mussels depend on microor-ganisms and learning. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 2623-2630
Formation of the chemical search images in laboratory
In 1986, Kasymyan & Ponomarev have published the results of their behavioural experiments with several tens of zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio, divided into two
training groups. In training Group 1, fish were fed (from birth to 3 month age) planktonic Cladocera and bloodworms (Chironomus plumosus), in Group 2 Cladocera and sludge worms (Tubifex tubifex).
Then
fish were moved into an experimental aquarium, where they had the
possibility to select one of two sections: with water extract of
bloodworms and, respectively, with water extract of sludge worms (under
concentration of these extracts 10-2
– 10-3 g/l). According to Kasumyan & Ponomarev (1986), fish of the first group preferred (displaying search feeding behaviour) an aquarium section with the Chironomus plumosus odor, and vise versa — fish of the second group preferred another section, with the Tubifex tubifex odor.
In other words, training fish preferred the familiar feeding odors.
In general and applied ethology, this phenomenon is considered in the terms of an acquired search image. An acquired search image forms in the long-term memory of an animal during its learning (both in the nature or laboratory) and is used
further as an etalon (template, specimen) to collate the receiving perceptual information. In our case, an acquired chemical search image forms in respect of an odor of some object.
How chemical search images form in other fish and crustaceans, study the basic references given below.
Basic References
Atema J., Holland K., Ikehara W. 1980. Olfactory responses of yellowfin
tuna (Thunnus albacares) to prey odors: chemical search image. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6, 457-465
Brown G.E.,
Smith R.J.F. 1994. Fathead minnows use chemical cues to discriminate shoalmates
from unfamiliar conspecifics. Journal of
Chemical Ecology 20, 3051-3061
Connaughton V.P., Epifanio C.E. 1993. The influence
of previous experience on the feeding habits of larval weakfish (Cynoscion
regalis). Marine Ecology Progress
Series 101, 237-241
Derby C.D., Atema J. 1981. Selective improvement in responses
to prey odors by the lobster, Homarus americanus, following feeding experience.
Journal of Chemical Ecology 7,
1073-1078
Hazlett
B.A. 1994. Crayfish feeding responses to zebra mussels depend on microorganisms
and learning. Journal of Chemical Ecology
20, 2623-2630
Hsiao S.C., Tester A. L.1955. Reaction of
tuna to stimuli, 1952-1953. Part II. Response of tuna to
visual and visual-chemical stimuli. United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific
Report: Fisheries 130, 63-76
Kasumyan A.O., Ponomarev V.Y. 1986. Study of the behaviour of
zebrafish Brachydanio rerio Hamilton-Buchanan under the influence of natural chemical food signals. Journal of Ichthyology 26, 665-673
McBride J.R., Idler D.R., Jonas R.E.E.,
Tomlinson N. 1962. Olfactory perception in juvenile salmon. I. Observations on
response of juvenile sockeye to extracts of foods. Journal of the Fisheries
Research Board of Canada
19, 327-334
Ristvey A., Rebach S. 1999. Enhancement
of the response of rock crabs, Cancer
irroratus, to prey
odors following feeding experiments. Biological
Bulletin 197, 361-367
Thacker R.W. 1996. Food choices of land hermit
crabs (Coenobita compressus H. Milne Edwards) depend on past
experience. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 199,
179-191.
Tester A. L., van Weel P.B., Naughton
J.J. 1955. Reaction of tuna to stimuli, 1952-1953. Part I. Response of tuna to chemical
stimuli. United States Department of the
Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific Report: Fisheries
130, 1-62
Uiblein F. 1993. Expectancy
controlled sampling decisions in Vimba
elongata. Environmental Biology of
Fish 33, 311-316
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is the largest animal rights organization in the world, with more than 3 million members and supporters.
PETA focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: on factory farms, in the clothing trade, in laboratories, and in the entertainment industry.
In addition, PETA works actively on many other issues, including the cruel killing of beavers, birds, and other "pests" as well as cruelty to the domesticated animals.
PETA focuses its attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of time: on factory farms, in the clothing trade, in laboratories, and in the entertainment industry.
In addition, PETA works actively on many other issues, including the cruel killing of beavers, birds, and other "pests" as well as cruelty to the domesticated animals.
Search image formation: food selection in common carp
In 1997,
Ivlev has published the results of his laboratory feeding experiments with several tens of common carp, Cyprinus carpio, divided into four
training groups. In training Group 1, fish were fed only chironomidae larvae (bloodworms), in Group 2
sideswimmers, in Group 3 water louses, and in Group 4 freshwater molluscs,
respectively.
After 10
days of training, fish of each group were moved on mixed, four-component diet contained
the foregoing food items in equal parts. Interestingly, in this
mixed diet fish selected predominantly familiar foods, remembered by them in the 10-day training
period (see Table).
Table. Indexes of food electivity in common carp trained before to eat one species of food (Ivlev, 1977)
Food | Group 1 index of electivity | Group 2 index of electivity | Group 3 index of electivity | Group 4 index of electivity |
Bloodworms, Chironomus plumosus | + 0.37 | + 0.19 | + 0.10 | + 0.12 |
Sideswimmers, Corophium chelicorne | - 0.13 | + 0.28 | - 0.19 | - 0.21 |
Water louses, Asellus aquaticus | - 0.15 | - 0.17 | + 0.28 | - 0.20 |
Freshwater molluscs, Limnaea ovata | - 0.54 | - 0.56 | - 0.51 | + 0.20 |
In trophic ecology, this phenomenon is named an acquired food electivity (acquired feeding electivity).
Generally, an index of food electivity, denoted by letter E, can range from -1 (absolute rejection) to +1 (absolute preference). E=0 means that some food is not rejected and is not preferred (that is this food is indifferent on electivity for an eater).
In general and applied ethology, the same phenomenon is considered in the terms of search image. An acquired serch image forms in the long-term memory of an animal during its learning (both in the nature or laboratory) and is used further as an etalon (template, specimen) to collate the receiving perceptual information. Without constant verification, an acquired serch image is forgotten within some time period.
In our context, search images can form in respect of food or live prey, their colors, odors and other stimuli.
In common carp (Ivlev, 1977), approximately 1.5 week of training is needed to form the relatively stable search images (with indexes of food electivity more than +0.20, see Table). Fish can switch from one search image to another, but after the corresponding training (learning). To form the more stable search images (with indexes of food electivity no less than +0.80), approximately 1 month of training is needed (Ivlev, 1977).
Basic References
Ivlev V.S. 1977. An experimental ecology of fish feeding. Naukova Dumka, Kyiv
Meet. An ethological contaminator: Blue Fox
The world
known Blue Fox fishing tackle company, one of the members of the Rapala Group,
offers an extended series of fishing attractants under the trade mark Dr. Juce
Scents.
Unfortunately, we do not know:
Unfortunately, we do not know:
- real substances that are included in these attractants, concentrations of active substances
- behavioural responses of fish induced by these attractants
- their indirect effects on other aquatic animals
- their real effectiveness confirmed by the statistical data, free and public
- general conditions of destruction of these attractants in the water environment
This
example shows that all we are facing the urgent need to create the
contemporary system to certify fishing attractants and silimilar
products. This system must provide answers on the above questions. In
the absence of this system, we will have bottled products of
questionable content like Blue Fox Dr. Juice and silimilars.
Please ask Dr. Gregory Bambenek (Dr. Juice), the author of these attractants, to answer the forgoing questions!
Blue Fox & Rapala Group: stop fake or confirm your fairness
Among
various Blue Fox’s Dr.
Juice pheromone attractants, the nature and the effectiveness of the Dr. Juice
Northern & Musky attractant, offered for Northern pike, Esox lucius, amd musky, E. masquinongy, are unclear.
In
accordance with data received in the laboratory and field scientific experiments,
pike (and musky) do not respond to conspecific odors and feeding substances
like fish blood, tissue extracts or worm juice.
On the other hand, pike respond to (and are attracted by) the conspecific sexual pheromones as well as on the
so called alarm pheromones, which are contained in the skin of cyprinid fish and
released in the water chiefly after its damage (for example, by pike teeth).
For more
information, see Olfactory behaviour of microsmatic
fish, including Northern pike (Esox lucius)
It
this
context, the Fishermen Advocates group offers Blue Fox, the member of
the Rapala Group, to publish in the Internet statistical data confirmed
the
effectiveness of Dr. Juice Northern & Musky attractant within, say,
1-2 months after this claim. To the point, what Dr. Gregory Bambenek,
the author of the attractant, thinks about? In the absence of argued
data after expiration of that term, lawers of the
Fishermen Advocates group will have the right to include the Dr. Juice Northern & Musky attractant in the category
of forgeries with the appropriate legal effects.
Environmental Society Versus Angling Contamination
Environmental Society Versus Angling Contamination
is the newest global movement established by
the Fishermen Advocates group.
Our main objectives are the following:
preventing the water pollution, known as an eutrophication,
by fishing groundbaits due to their
incorrect compositions, excessive use or others,
and preventing the water pollution,
known as an ethological pollution, by behaviour active
substanses, which are able to disturb the
natural behaviour of fish and other aquatic animals
Discovering False Advertising
Discovering False Advertising
is our version of the global movements
against false advertising.
Our main objective,
as the Fishermen Advocates group, is
firstly, to discover false advertisings in all
areas of the fishing industries.
Secondly, to stop these cases
through public pressure on the forgers and,
if necessary, their legal prosecution
Can you understand how Blue Fox Dr. Juice fishing pheromone attractants work? An example of false advertising
The world
known Blue Fox fishing tackle company, one of the members of the Rapala Group,
offers an extended series of fishing attractants under the trade mark Dr. Juce
Scents.
The company writes: Pro anglers and those "in the know” trust "The Juice” to attract and catch more fish. Using the fish’s powerful sense of smell, Dr. Juice triggers the attack pheromones found in all species, to turn otherwise docile fish into aggressors. And entitles this: Proven for years to help anglers boat more fish.
For ethologists and educated anglers, it is very difficult to understand this description.
In
addition, we do not think that "Orient and Mayan jungles" with their
ancient cultures, visited by Dr. Juice (alias Dr. Gregory Bambenek), the
author of the foregoing attractants and the owner of the foreging trade
mark, are right places to search... fish pheromones (see Blue Fox paper catalogs).
Study, for
example, how fish pheromones can be really used to control fish behavioural
responses:
Burnard D.,
Gozlan R.E., Griffiths
S.W. 2008. The role of
pheromones in freshwater fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 73, 1-16
Sorensen
P.W., Stacy N.E. 2004. Brief
review of fish pheromones and discussion of their possible uses in the control
of non-indigenous teleost fishes. New
Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38, 399–417
Verheggen F.J., Haubruge E., Mescher M.C.
2010. Alarm pheromones
chemical signaling in response to danger. Vitamins and Hormones 83,
216-239
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
In 1986, Kasymyan & Ponomarev have published the results of their behavioural experiments with several tens of zebrafish, Brachydanio r...